Supply Chain Fortitude in the Manufacturing Sector: Navigating Global Logistical Disruptions and Shifts in Industrial Confidence

Authors

  • Obyn Imhart Pumpente Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara
  • Wursan Universitas Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70076/simj.v3i1.168

Keywords:

supply chain fortitude, manufacturing sector, logistical disruptions, industrial confidence, digital readiness, redundancy capacity, resilience analytics

Abstract

Global manufacturing systems face increasing disruptions from geopolitical tensions, pandemic aftershocks, and transportation bottlenecks, threatening supply chain stability and industrial confidence. This study examines supply chain fortitude as an integrative capability encompassing endurance, flexibility, and anticipatory governance. A mixed-method approach was applied, combining cross-regional survey data, structural equation modeling (SEM), and in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that redundancy capacity and digital readiness significantly enhance supply chain fortitude, while disruption frequency negatively affects industrial confidence and decision agility. However, excessive digital investment shows diminishing returns without supplier diversification and organizational alignment. The study highlights that technological integration alone is insufficient, emphasizing the importance of structural and behavioral support mechanisms. Overall, supply chain fortitude is identified as a multidimensional construct integrating technological capability, structural redundancy, and psychological assurance to sustain strategic decision-making under persistent global uncertainty.

References

Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Boin, A., Kuipers, S., & Overdijk, W. (2021). Leadership in times of crisis: A framework for assessment. International Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17.

Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2022). Circular economy in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3088–3106.

Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2021). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(1), 1–16.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ivanov, D. (2022). Supply chain viability and the ripple effect: A systems approach to resilience analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 60(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890857

Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2023). Digital transformation of supply chains: A state-of-the-art literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 176, 108906.

OECD. (2023). Global value chains and industrial confidence indicators: Post-pandemic recovery trends. OECD Publishing.

Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2022). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: Mapping a research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 115–152.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Obyn Imhart Pumpente, & Wursan. (2026). Supply Chain Fortitude in the Manufacturing Sector: Navigating Global Logistical Disruptions and Shifts in Industrial Confidence. Smart International Management Journal, 3(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.70076/simj.v3i1.168

Issue

Section

Articles